anythingbutgrey: (hp; they started out beneath)
anythingbutgrey ([personal profile] anythingbutgrey) wrote2010-11-23 02:27 pm

HARRY POTTER NON-CANON SHIPS COMMENT FICATHON




Banner by [livejournal.com profile] operatingroom

Harry Potter Non-Canon Ships Comment Ficathon


THE RULES ARE THUS:

1. WHAT MAKES A NON-CANON SHIP? Anything that is not at least one-sided in the books. This means that Snape/Lily is canon, even if she may (or may not) have ever reciprocated. Bellatrix/Voldemort is canon. Lavendar/Ron is canon. Obviously everyone who's married and/or dates is canon. OBHWF is canon, Harry/Cho is canon. Ships that are not stated as fact in the books are not canon. That means UC ships are good, slash is good, femslash is good. For our purposes, we are not counting JKR's interviews as canon. That means that if you wanted to prompt, say, who knows, Hannah/Neville, you could, because it's not in the text itself.

2. You leave a comment with a pairing and a prompt. You respond to prompts that you like. Your prompt must pertain to a non-canon ship. You may specify a character within that ship if you want the fic written from that characters perspective. You may also specify a timeline if you'd like, or if you want it to take place in the movie!verse.

3. When writing fic, put in your title SHIP - TITLE OF FIC (rating optional). This will help us archive if we later archive things. I don't have time to archive anything right now, but if someone wants to volunteer, we can make that happen.

4. LEAVE FEEDBACK. Comments are the lifeblood of the internet.

5. NO WANK. I'll delete your ass. And we're dealing with ships and I am deletion happy, so watch yourself.

6. There will be spoilers for the movie all over this post, I am sure. You have been warned.

7. Promote this if you please. You can use this code:

For text link:





In the image code box, you can use any of the banners below or the lead banner at the top of the post.



They're all uploaded to tinypic, so you can just copy/paste the source code:

by [livejournal.com profile] eleusis_walks

by [livejournal.com profile] superkappa

by [livejournal.com profile] lenina20:








If you want to make your own banner, please post it here.

Have fun!

ETA:

[livejournal.com profile] effingeden has graciously offered to archive our prompts and fic here. Thanks so much!

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] miss-mishi.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
This is wonderful!

only cho would have been graduated because she was a year older than harry

BUT EVEN SO THIS IS PERFECTION <3

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
I THOUGHT SHE WAS AT HOGWARTS LIKE A BAMF.

FFFUUUU.

OH WELL. THIS IS A CANONICAL MESS FOR MANY REASONS. we'll pretend~

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] miss-mishi.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
IT'S OKAY THIS FICATHON IS NON!CANON ANYWAY

but yeah she was a hot fourth year on a broom when harry met her third year. she's cedric's year.

(over here shipping harry/cho like a bamf lolol)

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
i thought about this for a second and then was like 'oh, harry wouldn't date an older woman (and lol lbh no one older would date harry, except cho was in crisis mode), it must have just been cedric who was a year older!'

woops

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] miss-mishi.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
nbd I just remember these things. fount of useless knowledge. also this fic is still fantastic. SO NO WORRIES THERE.

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] eleusis-walks.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 08:42 am (UTC)(link)
it's not your fault, the movies fucked it up and put her in harry's year

Re: cho/neville - the heart for it (2/2)

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-11-25 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
GOOD I AM NOT TOTALLY OFF-BASE GOOD.